Jan van Eyck
The Arnolfini Wedding
1434
oil on panel
Length: 59.5 cm. Height: 82 cm.
National Gallery, London, England
Jan van Eyck is an artist that is
internationally famous for his unique use of oil paints during the Northern
Renaissance. One of his most well known pieces, now located at the National
Gallery in London, is the Arnolfini Marriage. There is a great debate revolving
around the subjects in this painting, as well as the context in which the
painting was made.
Marriage is one of the
biggest controversies surrounding the piece. There are a lot of symbols that
point in contradicting directions as to the figures’ status. Art historians are
not sure whether the figures are depicted as already married and the painting
is supposed to represent a legal document of the ceremony. Some evidence
supporting that theory is their hand gestures and the way Arnolfini's right
hand raised in a sort of oath to his future wife. Another theory is that
they are already married. However, the majority of marriage portraits depict
the bride with her hair down to resemble the Virgin Mary. Married women show
their piety through wearing their hair hidden under a veil. They also shave
their forehead as a beauty ideal.
An additional suggestion
is that it may be a memorial portrait, in the sense that she has already passed
away - most likely in childbirth. Symbolic details supporting that theory are
the images present of St. Margaret, the patron saint of pregnant women. The
scenes of the Passion are also depicted around the mirror between the figures,
with the more fatal scenes on the side of the wife. The candle in the
chandelier is also on lit on the side of Arnolifini to represent his life. Another
clue, which appears in many paintings from the Northern Renaissance, is the
oranges placed on the windowsill that represent the death brought into the
world from the Garden of Eden. Finally, is the way that the husband is dressed
in contrast to his wife. He is wearing black, which is still known to be a
color of mourning.
In addition to the
controversies regarding the status of the couple is the question of whether the
woman depicted is pregnant or not. Pregnancy is often seen as the key to the
paintings meaning. It appears as if she may be, however, some believe her dress
is cut that way as a style of the times rather than an intended suggestion of
pregnancy. Pregnancy, in that time, was both celebrated and feared. Death
during childbirth was much more common making the suggestion of a portrait to
record the pregnancy more likely.
Outside of actually
looking as if she is carrying a child, some other symbols are present in the
painting that suggest the same idea, such as the carpet and bed depicted behind
her. Carpet not covering the whole floor negates the idea of nobility but
supports a chamber for labor as the carpet is under the bed.
No comments:
Post a Comment